A new law in South Dakota prohibiting the use of eminent domain to acquire land for carbon capture pipelines challenges the ...
The environmental group is being sued for $300 million in North Dakota by a pipeline company in a case that has become a ...
South Dakota's governor has signed a bill into law that bans the taking of private property for building carbon dioxide ...
“North Dakota law is very clear that when potential ... More about Karen Zraick Climate F.A.Q.: Do you have questions about climate change? We’ve got answers. 150 Years of Change: In the ...
Energy Transfer, which owns the Dakota Access Pipeline, is seeking $300 million, a sum that Greenpeace says could bankrupt ...
Cuts to the U.S. agency responsible for weather forecasting and climate science have left scientists on this side of the ...
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech ... It's been three years since a Chinese company's plan to develop a swath of farmland near a North Dakota Air Force base prompted local ...
A $300 million lawsuit a pipeline company brought against Greenpeace in North Dakota has become a flash ... director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University.
South Dakota's governor signed a bill into law ... capture projects such as Summit's pipeline as a way to fight climate change and to help the ethanol industry. Opponents question carbon ...
In an era where sustainability and environmental stewardship have become paramount, researchers like Tawakalt Ayodele are ...
high-stakes trial that could change the American environmental movement forever—and crush Americans’ First Amendment rights. In a North Dakota district court, Texas pipeline company Energy ...