Whether or not money is the root of all evil, the root of our current American oligarchy is a single Supreme Court case.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Wednesday appeared poised to significantly weaken a key Voting Rights Act provision that prohibits states from diluting the power of minority voters — a ...

It’s the age-old question: Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles? Of course, this raises the obvious follow-up: Which cases are the important ...

The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon added another case to its oral argument docket for the 2025-26 term. The justices agreed to take up the case of Munson Hunter, a Texas man who pleaded guilty in ...

Supreme Court justices are expected to deliberate Friday over whether to consider overturning the court’s precedent legalizing same-sex marriage, meaning an announcement on the case’s fate could come ...

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court in January will hear a relatively modest number of cases, but each of them could have a major impact on the lives of millions of Americans. Perhaps the biggest case ...

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Dec. 8 in Trump v. Slaughter, a rather innocuous case that has the potential to reshape the landscape of our government’s separation of powers. While this case ...

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily. Blue states have repeatedly tried to rein in CPCs. But as faith-based organizations, ...

A woman in California successfully used AI tools, including ChatGPT, to overturn her eviction notice and avoid tens of thousands of dollars in penalties over several months of litigation. As NBC News ...

WASHINGTON – Disability rights groups fear a death penalty case before the Supreme Court could have implications for the intellectually disabled far beyond the criminal context. The justices are ...

It’s the age-old question: Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles? Many scholars and commentators unhesitatingly answer in the affirmative.