When a researcher wrote that maybe his peer review process would have gone better if he had cited the journal editor’s own papers, resignations and increased scrutiny followed.

Peer reviewers whose work is cited in the studies they are refereeing are significantly more likely to recommend accepting those papers than if their work is not cited, a new study has found. The ...

A report on children’s health released by the Make America Healthy Again Commission referred to scientific papers that did not exist. By Dani Blum and Maggie Astor The Trump administration released a ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. From left: Edward Tian, cofounder and CEO of GPTZero, with CTO and cofounder Alex Cui. (Courtesy of GPTZero) NeurIPS, one of the ...

AI detection startup GPTZero scanned all 4,841 papers accepted by the prestigious Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), which took place last month in San Diego. The company ...

As the fall semester came to a close, Andrew Heiss, an assistant professor in the Department of Public Management and Policy at the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University, ...

How did the construction of the Subaru Telescope transform Japanese astronomy? A new study provides a quantitative answer by analyzing scientific publications and their citation impact during the ...

NeurIPS, one of the world’s most prestigious AI research conferences, held its 39th annual meeting in San Diego in December, drawing tens of thousands of submissions and participants. What was once a ...